scholarly journals Soil-Applied Imidacloprid Is Translocated to Nectar and Kills Nectar-Feeding Anagyrus pseudococci (Girault) (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae)

2007 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 1238-1245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vera A. Krischik ◽  
Alyson L. Landmark ◽  
George E. Heimpel
2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fred C. Dyer ◽  
John Townsend-Mehler
Keyword(s):  

1979 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 544-548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis A. Magnarelli ◽  
John F. Anderson ◽  
John H. Thorne
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 179 (5) ◽  
pp. 553-562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Ayala-Berdon ◽  
Jorge E. Schondube ◽  
Kathryn E. Stoner

1982 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael W. Haiduk ◽  
Robert J. Baker
Keyword(s):  

Science ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 373 (6551) ◽  
pp. 226-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuka Toda ◽  
Meng-Ching Ko ◽  
Qiaoyi Liang ◽  
Eliot T. Miller ◽  
Alejandro Rico-Guevara ◽  
...  

Early events in the evolutionary history of a clade can shape the sensory systems of descendant lineages. Although the avian ancestor may not have had a sweet receptor, the widespread incidence of nectar-feeding birds suggests multiple acquisitions of sugar detection. In this study, we identify a single early sensory shift of the umami receptor (the T1R1-T1R3 heterodimer) that conferred sweet-sensing abilities in songbirds, a large evolutionary radiation containing nearly half of all living birds. We demonstrate sugar responses across species with diverse diets, uncover critical sites underlying carbohydrate detection, and identify the molecular basis of sensory convergence between songbirds and nectar-specialist hummingbirds. This early shift shaped the sensory biology of an entire radiation, emphasizing the role of contingency and providing an example of the genetic basis of convergence in avian evolution.


2018 ◽  
Vol 93 ◽  
pp. 118-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Ayala-Berdon ◽  
Cesar García Corona ◽  
Margarita Martínez-Gómez

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul M. Velazco ◽  
David W. Fleck ◽  
Nancy B. Simmons ◽  
J. Angel. Soto-Centeno ◽  
Robert S. Voss

PeerJ ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. e1597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Karolyi ◽  
Teresa Hansal ◽  
Harald W. Krenn ◽  
Jonathan F. Colville

Although anthophilous Coleoptera are regarded to be unspecialised flower-visiting insects, monkey beetles (Scarabaeidae: Hopliini) represent one of the most important groups of pollinating insects in South Africa’s floristic hotspot of the Greater Cape Region. South African monkey beetles are known to feed on floral tissue; however, some species seem to specialise on pollen and/or nectar. The present study examined the mouthpart morphology and gut content of various hopliine species to draw conclusions on their feeding preferences. According to the specialisations of their mouthparts, the investigated species were classified into different feeding groups. Adaptations to pollen-feeding included a well-developed, toothed molar and a lobe-like, setose lacinia mobilis on the mandible as well as curled hairs or sclerotized teeth on the galea of the maxillae. Furthermore, elongated mouthparts were interpreted as adaptations for nectar feeding. Floral- and folial-tissue feeding species showed sclerotized teeth on the maxilla, but the lacinia was mostly found to be reduced to a sclerotized ledge. While species could clearly be identified as floral or folial tissue feeding, several species showed intermediate traits suggesting both pollen and nectar feeding adaptations. Mismatches found between mouthpart morphology and previously reported flower visiting behaviours across different genera and species requires alternative explanations, not necessarily associated with feeding preferences. Although detailed examinations of the mouthparts allowed conclusions about the feeding preference and flower-visiting behaviour, additional morphological and behavioural investigations, combined with greater taxon sampling and phylogenetic data, are still necessary to fully understand hopliine host plant relationships, related to monkey beetle diversity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document